Meta-Innovation
in Practice

Coordinating transformation across domains, actors, and levels of system change.

Drawn from the doctoral research of Dr Shereen Amos, these case studies illustrate how meta-innovation enables large-scale transformation by aligning diverse actors, systems, and sectors around shared missions. Each case demonstrates how innovation expands beyond organisational or technological boundaries to integrate multiple domains (e.g. technology, policy, finance, social systems) and operate across multiple levels (micro, meso, macro) simultaneously.

Case Study 1 | Regen Farmers Mutual (Australia)

Transforming Agricultural Systems Through Farmer-Led Innovation

Regen Farmers Mutual (RFM) linked regenerative agriculture, conservation, environmental markets, and green finance into one farmer-owned system for environmental value creation. Operating at farm, landscape, and policy levels, it coordinated action across technical, institutional, and economic systems.

Transformative Vision:

Farmer-led environmental markets integrating economic viability with ecological regeneration—reframing farmers as central system innovators rather than passive market participants.

Domains bridged:

  • agriculture

  • conservation

  • finance

  • technology

  • policy

Levels engaged:

Micro: individual farmers empowered through ownership and capability building

Meso: creation of landscape-scale programmes and institutional partnerships

Macro: policy reform and market transformation

Cross-configurational orchestration:

  • Farmer-owned cooperative structure enabling democratic governance across scales

  • Digital twins bridging farm-level practice with landscape-scale market participation

  • Landscape Impact Programmes coordinating multi-property environmental initiatives

  • Local advisor networks translating policy and market access to farm level

Outcome: a replicable model for farmer-led environmental markets integrating economic viability with ecological regeneration.

Outcome:

a replicable model for farmer‑led environmental markets integrating economic viability with ecological regeneration.

Case Study 2 | Mobility-as-a-Service (Finland)

Reimagining Urban Transport Through Systemic Coordination

Finland's MaaS initiative restructured fragmented mobility systems by connecting public transport, private mobility providers, digital platforms, and environmental policy under one orchestrated framework. Government acted as enabler rather than controller, creating institutional conditions for systemic innovation.

Transformative Vision:

Sustainable, multimodal urban mobility—shifting from fragmented transport modes to an integrated system where government enables rather than controls coordination.

Domains bridged:

  • transportation

  • urban planning

  • digital platforms

  • environmental policy

  • behaviour change

Levels engaged:

Micro: seamless mobility experience for users

Meso: new partnerships across public and private mobility providers

Macro: policy frameworks promoting sustainable, multimodal access

Cross-configurational orchestration:

  • MaaS platform integrating diverse transport modes under single user interface

  • Government acting as enabler, creating institutional conditions rather than mandates

  • Shared data infrastructure enabling operators, users, and regulators to coordinate

  • Policy framework aligning private mobility innovation with public sustainability goals

Kivimaa, P., & Rogge, K. S. (2022). Interplay of policy experimentation and institutional change in sustainability transitions: The case of mobility as a service in Finland. Research Policy, 51(1).

Outcome: a coordinated model for sustainable urban mobility transitions.

Outcome:

a coordinated model for sustainable urban mobility transitions.

Case Study 3 | Solar Service Ventures (United States)

Building a Distributed Energy Ecosystem Through Collective Entrepreneurship

Sweden's solar transition emerged from interconnected entrepreneurs, activists, and policymakers who collectively built the cognitive, technical, and financial infrastructure for distributed energy. Innovation accumulated through shared learning rather than central planning.

Transformative Vision:

Decentralised renewable energy systems—shifting from centralised power generation to distributed solar adoption through collective entrepreneurship and shared learning infrastructure.

Domains bridged:

  • environmental activism

  • technology development

  • finance

  • policy

  • consumer adoption

Levels engaged:

Micro: entrepreneurial ventures and household adoption

Meso: formation of installer, financing, and regulatory networks

Macro: energy policy and cultural shifts toward decentralised power

Cross-configurational orchestration:

  • Interconnected entrepreneurs, activists, and policymakers building shared infrastructure

  • Cognitive infrastructure (shared learning) accumulating innovation without central planning

  • Technical networks linking installers, manufacturers, and service providers

  • Financial mechanisms enabling household adoption while supporting business model innovation

Overholm, H. (2015). Collectively created opportunities in emerging ecosystems: The case of solar service ventures. Technovation, 39-40, 14-25.

Outcome: a generative ecosystem model enabling distributed renewable energy transitions.

Outcome:

a generative ecosystem model enabling distributed renewable energy transitions.

Case Study 4 | Shanghai Sharing Mobility Transformation (China)

Multi-Stakeholder Coordination for Sustainable Urban Systems

Shanghai's transformation of its urban mobility system demonstrates meta-innovation as state-orchestrated ecosystem evolution. Facing escalating congestion, pollution, and fragmented transport modes, the city shifted from piecemeal interventions to an integrated strategy linking technology, infrastructure, policy, and social behaviour. Rather than regulating the sharing economy from the sidelines, the municipal government acted as ecosystem orchestrator—creating regulatory sandboxes, aligning public goals with private innovation, and investing in integration infrastructure (e.g. bike parking, EV charging, and data-sharing systems).

Transformative Vision:

Systemic urban mobility reconfiguration—shifting from ownership to access, from silos to integration, and from control to orchestration through government-coordinated ecosystem evolution.

Domains bridged:

  • technology

  • digital platforms

  • policy

  • infrastructure

  • finance

  • social practice

Levels engaged:

Micro: rapid experimentation by mobility startups developing new business models and technologies

Meso: platform-mediated coordination between users, operators, investors, and regulators

Macro: policy innovation, adaptive governance, and integration with sustainability and smart city agendas

Cross-configurational orchestration:

  • Municipal government acting as ecosystem orchestrator rather than regulator

  • Regulatory sandboxes enabling experimentation while managing risk

  • Integration infrastructure (bike parking, EV charging, data-sharing) bridging technology, policy, and social practice

  • Platform coordination aligning private innovation incentives with public sustainability goals

Ma, Y., et al. (2018). Co-evolution between urban sustainability and business ecosystem innovation: Evidence from the sharing mobility sector in Shanghai.

Outcome: a systemic reconfiguration of urban mobility—from ownership to access, from silos to integration, and from control to orchestration.

Outcome:

a systemic reconfiguration of urban mobility—from ownership to access, from silos to integration, and from control to orchestration.

Cross-Case Patterns

Across these diverse contexts, meta-innovation consistently involves:

Cross-domain integration – linking technological, financial, social, and policy systems to unlock new value logics.

Multi-level orchestration – connecting micro practices, meso infrastructures, and macro systems into aligned pathways of change.

Distributed coordination – enabling collective innovation through shared frameworks rather than centralised control.

Transformative vision – aligning economic, social, technological and environmental outcomes within a coherent systems agenda.

Why This Matters

Meta-innovation provides a structured approach for directing innovation at scale — not by creating isolated solutions, but by aligning and coordinating the conditions through which transformation occurs.

The Meta-Innovation Canvas supports this process by helping practitioners diagnose system readiness, design multi-actor collaborations, and orchestrate aligned action across boundaries.